Markus Pöllmann.
← Back to application portfolio
Illustrative example. "Nordlicht Screen Productions", "Kanal Vier", the contract terms and all figures below are synthetic — built to demonstrate the tool's reasoning, not a real client engagement. The interface, logic, and citation style match the production tool I built and operate for real production contracts.
Contract Aurora Frontier — 6×45' Documentary Series
Intake
New analysis — documents staged

3 files staged

Drag & drop or browse — PDF, DOCX, XLSX, MSG

  • aurora_frontier_main_agreement.pdf
  • format_bible.docx
  • budget_schedule.xlsx
Aurora Frontier — 6×45' Documentary Series
Nordlicht Screen Productions GmbH
Kanal Vier Streaming
2027
Step 1 of 5
1 Identify the Contract
(a) Both parties have approved the agreement and are committed to perform
(b) Each party's rights are identifiable — delivery of six episodes against a defined grant of exploitation rights
(c) Payment terms are identifiable — four milestone invoices against a fixed fee
(d) The contract has commercial substance
(e) Collection of the consideration is probable — established commissioning broadcaster, no default history
IFRS 15.9(a)–(e) — all five criteria met
Step 2 of 5
2 Identify Performance Obligations
Pre-production, production, and post-production are not distinct — the producer provides a significant service of integrating them into one combined output: the finished, delivered series
IFRS 15.22, 15.27, 15.29
The SVOD licence is not distinct from that output either — the customer cannot benefit from the granted rights without the finished series they attach to
IFRS 15.B54(b) — licence bundled with the goods or services it depends on
1 combined performance obligation — production service + licence
Step 3 of 5
3 Determine the Transaction Price
Fixed consideration of €480,000; no variable consideration, bonus, or penalty mechanics identified — no constraint assessment required
IFRS 15.47, 15.50
No significant financing component — the practical expedient applies: the expected period between the milestone payments and the transfer of the series is nine months, i.e. one year or less
IFRS 15.63 (practical expedient); milestones also track production progress rather than financing, IFRS 15.61(c)
Step 4 of 5
4 Allocate the Transaction Price
Allocation on a relative stand-alone selling price basis is required only where a contract contains more than one performance obligation. With a single combined obligation, the full transaction price of €480,000 attaches to it and no allocation step arises
IFRS 15.73–74
Step 5 of 5
5 Recognize Revenue — Over Time vs. Point in Time
Threshold question — licence or service? The contract grants a licence, so the licensing guidance is tested first. Because the licence is not distinct (Step 2), IFRS 15.B55 routes the combined obligation back to the general model in IFRS 15.31–38. The right-to-access / right-to-use test in B57–B62 governs distinct licences only and does not apply here
IFRS 15.B52, 15.B54, 15.B55
(a) The customer does not simultaneously receive and consume the benefits — an unfinished series delivers no benefit
IFRS 15.35(a)
(b) The producer's performance does not create or enhance an asset the customer controls as it is created — rights pass only on final delivery and acceptance
IFRS 15.35(b)
(c) Fails on the cumulative test. The two limbs must both hold:
· Enforceable right to payment — met. On termination for convenience the producer may invoice cost plus a reasonable margin for work completed, not merely cost recovery (IFRS 15.37).
· No alternative use — not met. The producer retains ownership of the series and grants only an exclusive SVOD window. Free-TV, home entertainment, and all exploitation after the window expire back to the producer, so the completed asset can be directed to another customer. IFRS 15.36 requires a substantive contractual or practical restriction on redirecting the finished asset — an exclusive licence for one window is not that
IFRS 15.35(c), 15.36, 15.37
None of the three over-time criteria is met
Control transfers at a point in time — on acceptance and grant of the licence. Indicators: present right to payment, transfer of the exploitation rights, the customer's acceptance of the delivered masters
IFRS 15.38
Point in time — on delivery and acceptance
Note — the clause that looks decisive but isn't: the termination-for-convenience clause satisfies the payment limb of IFRS 15.35(c) cleanly, and on its own would be the classic over-time trigger. It does not carry the conclusion here, because 35(c) is cumulative and the alternative-use limb fails. Had the contract been a full buy-out — all rights assigned to Kanal Vier for the full term — the alternative-use limb would flip and the same clause would move the entire €480,000 to over-time recognition. That single drafting difference is the judgement this analysis exists to document.
Result
Analysis complete
Conclusion
IFRS 15 — Revenue recognized at a point in time, on delivery and acceptance
Basis: none of the IFRS 15.35 over-time criteria is met — the producer retains ownership and the residual exploitation rights, so the completed series has an alternative use. Control transfers on acceptance under IFRS 15.38.

Summary

Nordlicht Screen Productions GmbH ("the producer") is commissioned by Kanal Vier Streaming ("the customer") to deliver a bespoke six-part documentary series for a fixed fee of €480,000, invoiced across four milestones tied to production progress. The producer grants an exclusive worldwide SVOD licence effective on final delivery and retains ownership of the work together with every right outside that window.

The licence is not distinct from the production service, so the two form one combined performance obligation and IFRS 15.B55 refers the timing question back to the general model. None of the three over-time criteria in IFRS 15.35 applies. The customer consumes no benefit during production and controls no asset as it is created; and while the termination clause gives the producer an enforceable right to cost plus margin, the retained residual rights mean the finished series does not lack an alternative use. Because IFRS 15.35(c) requires both limbs, it fails. Revenue is therefore recognized at the point in time at which control passes — acceptance of the delivered masters and effectiveness of the licence.

Cost side. Production spend is not automatically IFRS 15.95 fulfilment cost: that paragraph applies only to costs outside the scope of another standard, and here IAS 2 or IAS 38 takes precedence because the producer builds and retains an asset of its own. The milestone invoices raised ahead of transfer are contract liabilities until recognition.

Contract Details

ProducerNordlicht Screen Productions GmbH
CommissionerKanal Vier Streaming
Format6 × 45 min, documentary
Contract value€480,000 (fixed)
Rights grantedExclusive SVOD window on delivery; residual rights retained by producer

Production Profile

Production year2027
Business unitFactual / Non-Fiction
Est. production window9 months
Termination clauseProducer retains right to invoice cost + margin for work completed
Swing factorFull buy-out would flip this to over time
i Audit Trail
  • Day 0, 09:14Contract uploaded (3 documents: main agreement, format bible, budget schedule)
  • Day 0, 09:18AI analysis completed — conclusion: point in time, all 62 fields populated with citations
  • Day 0, 14:02Reviewed — Preparer: M. Pöllmann. Rights schedule re-checked against the main agreement; alternative-use limb confirmed as failing
  • Day 1, 10:37Released — Reviewer: J. Weber, Finance (four-eyes control — preparer ≠ releaser enforced by the tool)
Swipe, use ← → , or click a step number